Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] iproute is being removed ...
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 20:59:03
Message-Id: 20040422205901.GA1178@cerberus.oppresses.us
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] iproute is being removed ... by Jon Portnoy
1 On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 04:57:40PM -0400, Jon Portnoy wrote:
2 > On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 10:04:18PM +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
3 > > On Thursday 22 April 2004 06:02, Mike Frysinger wrote:
4 > > > no, thats not what virtuals are for
5 > >
6 > > You know, if you started using repoman like plenty of us keep asking you to,
7 > > these sort of problems could get caught before they affect end users.
8 > >
9 >
10 > As far as I know, repoman can't check reverse dependencies, meaning it
11 > probably would not have caught this situation.
12 >
13
14 I should've mentioned --
15 This doesn't change the fact that everyone really *must* use repoman
16 consistently. If there's something wrong with repoman that prevents it
17 from being usable, getting it fixed should be a priority, but it's
18 really essential.
19
20 --
21 Jon Portnoy
22 avenj/irc.freenode.net
23
24 --
25 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list