1 |
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:14:00 -0700 |
2 |
Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > No, I was told to remove kdebuild-1 from the version sent to the |
4 |
> > Council for approval. Doing so is just a case of toggling a switch |
5 |
> > in PMS. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > Also, until they were all mysteriously fired, Gentoo's KDE people |
8 |
> > were planning to ask the Council for official approval of |
9 |
> > kdebuild-1 so that it could remain in PMS. So that's still up in |
10 |
> > the air too. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> All? Only one person I know of, Philantrop. Were rbrown or spb |
13 |
> committing much to KDE stuff? |
14 |
|
15 |
All three were involved in the design of kdebuild-1. |
16 |
|
17 |
> > And docbook does integrate with Gentoo? Please point me to other |
18 |
> > Gentoo documentation that uses docbook. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/trunk/doc/ |
21 |
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-projects/pax-utils/man/ |
22 |
|
23 |
So no actual Gentoo documentation then, just documentation for some |
24 |
programs hosted by Gentoo? |
25 |
|
26 |
> > Also, I've yet to be told how to get automatic, verified, |
27 |
> > zero-work-upon-relocation cross-document links using either docbook |
28 |
> > or guidexml. Perhaps you'd care to explain. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> You've mentioned this as a requirement. Is it something that happens |
31 |
> so often that it's a significant burden if it isn't available? |
32 |
|
33 |
Yes. |
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
Ciaran McCreesh |