| 1 |
On Friday 20 April 2012 15:38:19 Leho Kraav wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 9:10:02 PM UTC+3, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > it isn't uncommon for people to want to force the patch (-p#) or fuzz |
| 4 |
> > (-f#) level when applying specific patches. but it is unusual that they |
| 5 |
> > want to kill off the extra options: -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch. so |
| 6 |
> > i'd like to split these off and improve the epatch API. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> LOL mike, i'm fighting with this thing at the very moment. there's a patch |
| 9 |
> i received that has whitespace issues and i'd like to specify custom |
| 10 |
> EPATCH_OPTS. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> i applied the patch to my eclass overlay, and einfo is showing that the new |
| 13 |
> eclass is used. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
i just committed it since no one responded. so sync up. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> $ EPATCH_OPTS="--ignore-whitespace" emerge -va pf-sources |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
that's not the intention. EPATCH_OPTS modification should be inside the |
| 20 |
ebuild. |
| 21 |
-mike |
Archives