1 |
Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> said: |
2 |
> Mark Loeser posted <20060424131128.GH690@×××××××××××××.com>, excerpted |
3 |
> below, on Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:11:28 -0400: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> >> > * QA will take an active role in cleaning up unmaintained and broken |
6 |
> >> > packages from the tree. It is also encouraged of members of the QA |
7 |
> >> > team to assist in mentoring new developers that wish to take over |
8 |
> >> > unmaintained packages/herds. |
9 |
> >> |
10 |
> >> i am not sure how to read this one, it could mean broken packages that |
11 |
> >> are unmaintained, but how it is written it could also mean unmaintained |
12 |
> >> || broken, not only unmaintained && broken, i really wish you would at |
13 |
> >> least consider not killing off unmaintained and not broken packages, |
14 |
> >> and word it in some way that this comes out clear in that paragraph |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > It is written exactly how I meant for it to be interpretted. We will be |
17 |
> > removing things that are unmaintained *and* broken. I'm sure the |
18 |
> > security team will agree that this is a problem that currently plagues |
19 |
> > them as well, and I think we can help them out by doing what we can in |
20 |
> > this regard. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> What about "... cleaning up and removing from the tree unmaintained |
23 |
> packages as they are found to be broken."? |
24 |
|
25 |
Works for me, and gets the point across more clearly. |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Mark Loeser - Gentoo Developer (cpp gcc-porting qa toolchain x86) |
29 |
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org |
30 |
mark AT halcy0n DOT com |
31 |
web - http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/ |
32 |
http://www.halcy0n.com |