| 1 |
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 20.48, Matthew Kennedy wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Hi Tony, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> This is the list I've started to work off of: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=&short_desc_type=allwordssu |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> There's really only 14 open bugs, however I leave the closed ones in |
| 10 |
> the list for historical interest. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Thats pretty good really. I guess the show stopper is the glib issues with |
| 13 |
gtk-2 as rebuilding dependancies isn't handled yet by portage IIRC. Rest |
| 14 |
seem like drop the hammer patch and turn optimisation down on a couple of |
| 15 |
ebuilds. Only problem I have with my own statement is I have no idea what |
| 16 |
the test coverage is like with the regression testing. I'll try a couple of |
| 17 |
builds next week once I have moving house out of the way. My head will be a |
| 18 |
little cooler then so I won't bark so loudly :) I would guess a normal |
| 19 |
system build is only covering about 25% of the packages in portage. A meta |
| 20 |
package to build everything non conflicting would be useful for this type of |
| 21 |
thing. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
tony |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Contract ASIC and FPGA design. |
| 27 |
Telephone +46 702 894 667 |
| 28 |
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x633E2623 |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives