* Re: [gentoo-dev] *IMPORTANT* top-level management structure!
@ 2003-06-25 20:50 99% ` Tony Clark
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Tony Clark @ 2003-06-25 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 20.48, Matthew Kennedy wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> This is the list I've started to work off of:
>
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=&short_desc_type=allwordssu
>
> There's really only 14 open bugs, however I leave the closed ones in
> the list for historical interest.
Thats pretty good really. I guess the show stopper is the glib issues with
gtk-2 as rebuilding dependancies isn't handled yet by portage IIRC. Rest
seem like drop the hammer patch and turn optimisation down on a couple of
ebuilds. Only problem I have with my own statement is I have no idea what
the test coverage is like with the regression testing. I'll try a couple of
builds next week once I have moving house out of the way. My head will be a
little cooler then so I won't bark so loudly :) I would guess a normal
system build is only covering about 25% of the packages in portage. A meta
package to build everything non conflicting would be useful for this type of
thing.
tony
--
Contract ASIC and FPGA design.
Telephone +46 702 894 667
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x633E2623
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2003-06-25 1:33 [gentoo-dev] *IMPORTANT* top-level management structure! Daniel Robbins
2003-06-25 17:42 ` Tony Clark
2003-06-25 18:48 ` Matthew Kennedy
2003-06-25 20:50 99% ` Tony Clark
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox