| 1 |
All, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
You've all stated that you accept or don't accept (but this is targeted |
| 4 |
at the acceptors, sorry non-acceptors) but the people that accept |
| 5 |
haven't really given much reason as to why they would be a good |
| 6 |
candidate. In fact many of the nominations don't even have that |
| 7 |
information attached. Because right now, no one has earned my vote. If |
| 8 |
it came down to voting right now, I'd have to side with all the American |
| 9 |
Republicans in the crowd and vote "None of the Above" [1] [2]. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
So, let's hear some reasons why I as a Gentoo developer should vote for |
| 12 |
you. And here's a hint, be more forward looking then the current 100+ |
| 13 |
post threads on the -dev ML. Let's hear your {2,3,5} year plan for Gentoo. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
For the sake of everyone's sanity, please don't reply directly to this |
| 16 |
thread. Please start a new thread that states "So and So's Platform" or |
| 17 |
some such. Also, if you want to blog it or put it on your dev webspace |
| 18 |
it might be a better idea. That being said, that means there should be |
| 19 |
no replies to this thread. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
[1] http://www.fark.com |
| 22 |
[2] |
| 23 |
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070717/ap_on_el_pr/presidential_race_ap_poll |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Doug Goldstein |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives