Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Council Nominations
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 20:33:37
1 All,
3 You've all stated that you accept or don't accept (but this is targeted
4 at the acceptors, sorry non-acceptors) but the people that accept
5 haven't really given much reason as to why they would be a good
6 candidate. In fact many of the nominations don't even have that
7 information attached. Because right now, no one has earned my vote. If
8 it came down to voting right now, I'd have to side with all the American
9 Republicans in the crowd and vote "None of the Above" [1] [2].
11 So, let's hear some reasons why I as a Gentoo developer should vote for
12 you. And here's a hint, be more forward looking then the current 100+
13 post threads on the -dev ML. Let's hear your {2,3,5} year plan for Gentoo.
15 For the sake of everyone's sanity, please don't reply directly to this
16 thread. Please start a new thread that states "So and So's Platform" or
17 some such. Also, if you want to blog it or put it on your dev webspace
18 it might be a better idea. That being said, that means there should be
19 no replies to this thread.
21 [1]
22 [2]
25 --
26 Doug Goldstein
27 --
28 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list


Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Council Nominations Torsten Veller <tove@g.o>