| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 21/06/13 03:53 PM, Alex Xu wrote: |
| 5 |
> On 21/06/13 03:27 PM, Sergey Popov wrote: |
| 6 |
>> 21.06.2013 23:22, Sergey Popov пишет: |
| 7 |
>>> 2) package has dead upstream, does not build with current |
| 8 |
>>> gcc/glibc/binutils/whatever and can not be fixed - bug is |
| 9 |
>>> closed as OBSOLETE. |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> Of course i am talking about long-standing bugs, that assigned |
| 13 |
>> to maintainer-wanted@. That's why OBSOLETE seems to be a better |
| 14 |
>> decision, but WONTFIX is reasonable too :-) |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
> nobody needs it: OBSOLETE it doesn't work: CANTFIX |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
For many m-w bugs, its existence in overlays like sunrise still apply |
| 20 |
here to whether or not the bug should be left active and valid, tho. |
| 21 |
I think it might still be beneficial to filter out the m-w bugs that |
| 22 |
are tagged with InOverlay -- or at least, not expect them to be |
| 23 |
resolved or closed unless the sunrise dev's take care of this when |
| 24 |
they drop the package. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 30 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlHIYa4ACgkQ2ugaI38ACPADuQD/RSPQY3rmzp9tjVURHZFNgsut |
| 33 |
04MIae+7g/S9AcG64e8BAKmqmIBHeJv0+qDDfs5gZA9xoEJBiRmxDaFrdLnmBDZS |
| 34 |
=Yyyi |
| 35 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives