| 1 |
On 05/12/2014 01:17 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 2 |
> It's only me who spoke on behalf of LXDE so far :( gtk2 is still |
| 3 |
> alive, and lxde said that while it's still alive, the GTK lxde will |
| 4 |
> still be supported. After all, lxde-base, as the name implies, is for |
| 5 |
> lxde-related packages (maintained by lxde@). The new project is lxqt, |
| 6 |
> which makes the lxde category slightly irrelevant. Since the lxde team |
| 7 |
> has nothing to do with it, this will add more confusion. That's my |
| 8 |
> opinion. Same thing for razor-qt apparently. Fortunately/unfortunately |
| 9 |
> there is this tendency to use a distinct category (and set of |
| 10 |
> maintainers/herd) for each DE. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I'm of the same opinion. Since lxde will still be supported, I'm leaning |
| 13 |
towards keeping lxde-base for lxde-related packages and using a new |
| 14 |
category for lxqt. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
>>> compton-conf |
| 17 |
>>> libqtxdg |
| 18 |
>>> qt-gtk-engine |
| 19 |
>>> libfm |
| 20 |
>>> libsysstat |
| 21 |
>>> obconf-qt |
| 22 |
>>> pcmanfm-qt |
| 23 |
>> I think these packages could be placed in the relevant x11-* |
| 24 |
>> categories, as they are perfectly usable in other environments as |
| 25 |
>> well, tho for ease of maintenance you could stick them with the LXQt |
| 26 |
>> packages. |
| 27 |
>> |
| 28 |
> +1 (pcmanfm-qt is already in the tree in x11-misc/, libfm too etc) |
| 29 |
> Maybe it's possible to merge obconf and obconf-qt with a new 'qt' use |
| 30 |
> flag. The less duplication we do, the less time we will need to spend |
| 31 |
> maintaining the packages. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Agreed. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Regards, |
| 37 |
Pavel |
Archives