1 |
Am Montag, 3. Februar 2020, 05:20:42 CET schrieb Benda Xu: |
2 |
> Gerion Entrup <gerion.entrup@×××××.de> writes: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > I saw the idea „Big Data Infrastructure by Gentoo“ and found it kind of |
5 |
> > interesting. However, I have a little bit the fear that a full automation |
6 |
> > won't be possible and the whole project becomes a little bit like g-sorcery |
7 |
> > (gs-pypi, gs-elpa) or g-octave: a really cool project but not used at a |
8 |
> > large scale. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Yes, that's true. I share the same observation and concern with you. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> This is one exception: the CRAN ebuild generator powered R overlay has |
13 |
> been running well for 8 years. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Science/Overlay/R |
16 |
Hmm, interesting, thank you. |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
> > What do you think of the idea to not do this fully automated but supervised |
20 |
> > by a maintainer? With that I mean an ebuild generator that generates only |
21 |
> > the parts of the ebuild that it can easily parse and then present the ebuild |
22 |
> > draft to a maintainer who completes it to an full ebuild. As far a I know no |
23 |
> > tool like this exists. I think the focus shift helps a lot: |
24 |
> > Developing a tool for the Gentoo maintainer not the Gentoo user. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Yes, that makes a lot of sense. The R overlay follows this model. Most |
27 |
> of the ebuilds are automated. When an ebuild generation fails, we add |
28 |
> the ebuild manually, understand it and then update the generator to |
29 |
> cover it in the future. |
30 |
Is this possible in all cases? I think of adding custom patches, |
31 |
appropriate mapping of dependencies, check for things like desktop icon |
32 |
cache... |
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
> > I'm only "maintaining" an overlay so maybe I'm missing experience |
36 |
> > but I often have wished a tool that automatically parses the language specific |
37 |
> > packaging files and is able to generate a primitive ebuild out of that. |
38 |
> > Maybe it even can do this in an interactive way: |
39 |
> > "Hey, upstream needs the dependency 'foo'. In the Gentoo packages I have found |
40 |
> > 'dev-bar/foo' and 'dev-util/foo'. What is the correct one?" |
41 |
> |
42 |
> Yes, that's the way R overlay is working. And I have a similar plan and |
43 |
> proof-of-concept solution for the Java Maven overlay. |
44 |
Nice to hear. I think, it is meaningful to solve all generation with one |
45 |
tool. Maybe it can even "recognize" the used build system and package |
46 |
database. Is this your plan, too? |
47 |
|
48 |
|
49 |
Best, |
50 |
Gerion |