1 |
Tom Wijsman: |
2 |
>> It improves usability by providing additional information. |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Usability is not to be found in information that is subject to change. |
5 |
> |
6 |
|
7 |
Please also set DEPEND, RDEPEND, EGIT_REPO_URI, DESCRIPTION and the rest |
8 |
of them to "", because they are all subject to change. |
9 |
|
10 |
> So, both quotes reveal that empty keywords fit very well; |
11 |
|
12 |
No, they just reveal that people didn't think carefully enough before |
13 |
establishing that policy. |
14 |
|
15 |
> by limiting its length. |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
Welcome to 2014. We have tools that can aid you with dealing with big files. |
19 |
|
20 |
> |
21 |
> Information that is a given; as known, live ebuilds miss arch testing. |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
If an ebuild hasn't been tested on _any_ arch, then it shouldn't be in |
25 |
the tree at all. |
26 |
|
27 |
In addition, it is obviously wrong, since most people will at least test |
28 |
their own live ebuilds on major arches and they are allowed to add those |
29 |
keywords without involving arch teams. |