| 1 |
Wernfried Haas posted <20060124185229.GB18929@×××××××××.rechner>, |
| 2 |
excerpted below, on Tue, 24 Jan 2006 19:52:29 +0100: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 01:44:28PM -0500, Mark Loeser wrote: |
| 5 |
>> We should aim for when it will be done in a way that minimizes the |
| 6 |
>> breakage for all of our users. Yes, breakage will happen, but we can wait |
| 7 |
>> until its down to a more reasonable value. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> And we probably should announce somewhere that this is going to happen |
| 10 |
> (if not done already, haven't been following the modular X thing too |
| 11 |
> closely). |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
There has been some coverage in GWN. Readers know modular-X is coming, |
| 14 |
have been invited to test it, and know how to get to it now (the modular-X |
| 15 |
HOWTO was linked), along with the fact that it's a big change and may |
| 16 |
cause some breakage. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
However, I do NOT believe a specific warning was given that it's going to |
| 19 |
happen on $DATE and ~arch users should know there might be a bit of |
| 20 |
breakage at that time. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 24 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 25 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in |
| 26 |
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives