| 1 |
On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 23:32, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> > On mechanism would be profile-level control to mask 2.6 on one profile, |
| 3 |
> > and enable it on another. though. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> honestly, no offense meant, but if a user has to change their profile just to |
| 6 |
> switch between 2.4 and 2.6, that's just stupid |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I think he meant for machines that only work under one of the other. |
| 9 |
Like there would be an default-linux/mips/2004.3 which uses 2.4 and a |
| 10 |
default-linux/mips/2004.3/o2 which uses 2.6, so that anyone building for |
| 11 |
an o2 box uses a different profile. The user doesn't switch profiles to |
| 12 |
switch kernels in this case, since their subarch is only capable of |
| 13 |
running on one kernel set. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 17 |
Release Engineering - Operations/QA Manager |
| 18 |
Games - Developer |
| 19 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Is your power animal a penguin? |
Archives