Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] force verbose build log as per PMS policy?
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 11:19:22
Message-Id: 50190F67.9060900@gentoo.org
1 We already had a discussion about cmake-utils.eclass and forcing verbose
2 build log for that which was approved:
3 http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_ce7d33748936663e84a5463fbf7f4d39.xml
4
5 Also we have bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384193 and
6 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379497
7
8 I opened a tracker https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429308
9
10 Some devs seem unsure about that or want to have a council vote on that
11 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429332
12
13
14 When I sum that up again...
15 - we are on gentoo and need as much information as possible for
16 backtracing, resolving bugs, checking whether CFLAGS and such have been
17 respected
18 - no need to tell the user to recompile with
19 EXTRA_ECONF="--disable-silent-rules" or similar just to be able to help him
20 - some QA checks might depend on verbose build log and are not yet
21 implemented therefor
22 - if people want nice build _output_ (not log), they can use --quiet-build

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] force verbose build log as per PMS policy? Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] force verbose build log as per PMS policy? "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] force verbose build log as per PMS policy? Francesco Riosa <vivo75@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] force verbose build log as per PMS policy? "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@g.o>