| 1 |
Collins Richey wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>On 4/23/05, Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>>According to bugzilla, there are lots of open bugs (132 to be exact) |
| 8 |
>>containing the word 'php' in the summary. From a quick glimpse many of |
| 9 |
>>them seem related to php-5. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
>Looks like your're 100% right. One user does not a stable release |
| 15 |
>make. The open PHP bugzillas seem to be roughly in three groups: |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
>1. Need testing with (pick one of a dozen major PHP addon packages). |
| 18 |
>Users could certainly help with this. |
| 19 |
>2. PHP5 ebuild problems (ebuild not working yet and/or dependancy |
| 20 |
>problems with other packages). |
| 21 |
>3. Actual failure to compile and/or run with certain packages. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
>I'm sure developers will eventually get to 2 & 3, but there are too |
| 24 |
>many bugs and too little time. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
>Since many of these bug reports aren't even assigned yet, I would say |
| 27 |
>that PHP5 is certainly not a stable package for Gentoo. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
>My $.02. Quichurbellyachin and get testing and debugging if you want a |
| 30 |
>stable release. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
Fair enough. And thank you for filling me in on the criteria for |
| 35 |
"stable". Now, I'll just count myself as one of the lucky ones instead. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
I'll go look into these open bugs, but I doubt I'll be in any position |
| 38 |
to contribute much to their closure. |
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives