| 1 |
Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
[ ... ] |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> And since we've come to the conclusion we can't put it in /opt, |
| 6 |
> /usr/kde/2,3 (or equivalent) is the only option left. The fhs |
| 7 |
> doesn't provide for having more than one version of a package |
| 8 |
> installed at a time but we have to do it with qt2/3 and kdelibs2/3 |
| 9 |
> (and gnome 1.4/2). I prefer that option over 100% FHS compliance. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
very well put, and I wholeheartedly agree. 100% FHS compliance is |
| 12 |
neat, if it would provide a solution for these problems. since it |
| 13 |
doesn't, one has to look outside the FHS and find a solution that |
| 14 |
causes the least bit of stress. and this has been achieved with |
| 15 |
Gentoo beyond a shadow of a doubt. great work! |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> End rant mode. I guess I just had leftover frustration stored from |
| 18 |
> the time I actually tried to make this work. Maybe we can put a |
| 19 |
> version of this in a FAQ somewhere because this isn't the first time |
| 20 |
> this question has been asked. Maybe if that fhs guy saw it he'd |
| 21 |
> think twice before blaming us. The fhs just doesn't accomodate |
| 22 |
> certain things. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
yup, if anyone is unhappy, make them provide an alternative. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Terje |
Archives