Archives
Archives
| From: | Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: ML changes | ||
| Date: | Sat, 14 Jul 2007 02:35:48 | ||
| Message-Id: | f79cjk$v55$2@sea.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes by Ned Ludd |
||
| 1 | Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 02:17 +0200, Robert Buchholz wrote: |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | >> I have to second the voices that a lot of user mails are productive. |
| 6 | >> I did |
| 7 | >> not do any stats, but I feel that most mails to -dev are currently by |
| 8 | >> Gentoo |
| 9 | >> devs anyway, so it will not seriously reduce the amount of mail in |
| 10 | >> total. |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | > FYI we do have stats.. |
| 13 | > |
| 14 | > http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-dev-per-month.xml |
| 15 | > http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-dev-per-year.xml |
| 16 | > http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/ |
| 17 | > |
| 18 | None of which have anything to do with the matter at hand, ie the proportion |
| 19 | of non-dev to dev emails. |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | -- |
| 23 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |