Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jim Ramsay <lack@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: INVALID -> NOCHANGE in bugzilla
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:48:20
Message-Id: 20070326094154.537b3121@sed-192.sedsystems.ca
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: INVALID -> NOCHANGE in bugzilla by "Kevin F. Quinn"
1 Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
2 > People reporting bugs often get annoyed when their bug is marked
3 > INVALID; especially when they're relatively new to the Gentoo
4 > Experience. We've all seen it many times, I'm sure.
5
6 I know I'm coming in late on this one, but I can see how having a bug
7 marked as INVALID with no explanation could be hurtful to the reporter.
8
9 However, if you add a comment to the effect of:
10
11 Marking this as 'invalid' because it's not really a bug, just
12 unexpected. For a longer discussion of the issue, see
13 [[some reference link]].
14
15 and then mark the bug as INVALID, maybe that's all that would be needed.
16
17 --
18 Jim Ramsay
19 Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox,gkrellm)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature