Archives
Archives
| From: | Christian Faulhammer <opfer@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: profile shift for arm/s390/sh from "stable" to "dev" | ||
| Date: | Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:09:59 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20080611220949.352c888c@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] profile shift for arm/s390/sh from "stable" to "dev" by Peter Alfredsen |
||
| 1 | Hi, |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Peter Alfredsen <loki_val@g.o>: |
| 4 | > Just for the extra dense among us, does this mean that when a |
| 5 | > security bug such as 216850[1] gets closed with no response from |
| 6 | > those arches, that in such cases we are allowed punt the affected |
| 7 | > ebuild, even though it will break your stable? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | No. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | V-Li |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project |
| 15 | <URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode |
| 16 | |
| 17 | <URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/> |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |