Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:03:52
Message-Id: 20100425040601.5dc8e5d7@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits by "Petteri Räty"
1 On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:40:54 +0300
2 Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > What do you think about not allowing commits to eclasses without
5 > mentioning an another developer who has reviewed and approved the diff
6 > in the commit message? There's enough people on gentoo-dev for urgent
7 > stuff too.
8
9 I think it's a good idea to strongly encourage it, but actually forcing it
10 through cvs? No thanks. I'm not tracking down another dev just to fix a
11 spelling mistake. :P
12
13
14 --
15 fonts, by design, by neglect
16 gcc-porting, for a fact or just for effect
17 wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>