| 1 |
El sáb, 23-06-2012 a las 11:53 +0200, Peter Stuge escribió: |
| 2 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
> > What is hurting is people demanding features without specifying what |
| 4 |
> > the problem is |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Part of enabling progress is to show a strong will to communicate, |
| 7 |
> with the goal of extracting common understanding from discussion. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> In any project based on volunteer effort you must show that you too |
| 10 |
> are interested in giving, for anyone to give you anything. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> When it's not obvious that you want to receive - to the point where |
| 13 |
> you drive the discussion (the horror!) in order to arrive at that |
| 14 |
> point of common understanding - then people will be upset and look |
| 15 |
> down on you, because dealing with you leaves too sour a taste behind. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> //Peter |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
As Peter explains, I think it is now clear enough what I was demanding |
| 21 |
(about clarifying what is needed to get things in next EAPI to prevent |
| 22 |
issues like Tommy is suffering to get multilib stuff done), but I star |
| 23 |
to think Ciaran thinks it's easier to simply wear a blindfold on to keep |
| 24 |
thinking all what he says cannot be corrected at all, neither improved |
| 25 |
and others must follow his instructions blindly |
Archives