Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thomas Cort <linuxgeek@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Making the developer community more open
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:17:22
Message-Id: 3b09e8e90603220613h224ec503vdf3b879c37bd556c@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Making the developer community more open by Michael Crute
1 > The process for getting unstable ebuilds from bugzilla to portage could
2 > even be automated to the extent that when an ebuild is put into
3 > bugzilla it gets auto committed to the tree but masked unstable.
4
5 I don't think that auto committing user submitted ebuilds is safe,
6 even if they are masked. For instance, someone could put something
7 malicious in global scope in the ebuild. Stuff in global scope gets
8 interpreted whenever the ebuild is sourced. More info on scope:
9 http://www.gentoolinux.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=3&chap=1#doc_chap3_sect4
10
11 -Thomas
12
13 --
14 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list