Archives
Archives
| From: | Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: qt.eclass | ||
| Date: | Sat, 02 Jul 2005 13:19:13 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20050702151536.639f6982@eusebe | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: qt.eclass by Dan Armak |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 2 Jul 2005 15:52:55 +0300 |
| 2 | Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > Maybe I should try to do that now, depending on their answer to |
| 5 | > my new comment in 33545... |
| 6 | |
| 7 | You may also want to have a look on bug #4315, since version |
| 8 | range is no more than a particular case of AND dependency. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | TGL. |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |