| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Friday 16 April 2004 16:12, Douglas Pollock wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Thursday 15 April 2004 23:30, Andrew Cowie wrote: |
| 6 |
> > My question: should I set about writing an ebuild to package up SWT |
| 7 |
> > as a separately installable library? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> If you are looking to do this, I might be able to help out a bit. I |
| 10 |
> work for IBM on the Eclipse project, and use Gentoo as my main |
| 11 |
> development platform. Feel free to email or message me (krzysiu) on |
| 12 |
> IRC. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Also take a look at the ebuild I put on bugzilla for eclipse. The current |
| 15 |
eclipse ebuild is quite broken as it leaves all kinds of source |
| 16 |
lingering around. I'm not sure though wether that way also works with |
| 17 |
the milestones for 3.0, but it works for 2.1.x. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Basically it will create zip files for all features and plugins. You can |
| 20 |
take those plugins you need and have a clean separation. Then you'd only |
| 21 |
need to move the files to a more sensible location and write a spec |
| 22 |
file. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Paul |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
- -- |
| 27 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 28 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 29 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 30 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
| 31 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 32 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
iD8DBQFAf+3ebKx5DBjWFdsRAvNiAJ98cJ+YAQBD9wj5YjT7zer7oC33tQCgl/in |
| 35 |
X7pCeZludrPHKrVsVa5BBKU= |
| 36 |
=p/wc |
| 37 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives