From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds | ||
Date: | Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:15:41 | ||
Message-Id: | 20161018161527.0f5ea1c4@snowblower | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds by "William L. Thomson Jr." |
1 | On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:43:40 -0400 |
2 | "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com> wrote: |
3 | > No its a PMS requirement as you said not visual as I was saying... |
4 | |
5 | PMS doesn't cover multiple repository stuff in much detail. We didn't |
6 | want to mandate Portage's historical weird overlay behaviour, so it |
7 | doesn't really specify anything at all. |
8 | |
9 | -- |
10 | Ciaran McCreesh |