Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Tomáš Chvátal" <scarabeus@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] kernel-2.eclass problem with unpacking patches
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 22:10:07
Message-Id: 4C93E19B.5010809@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] kernel-2.eclass problem with unpacking patches by Mike Frysinger
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Dne 17.9.2010 23:37, Mike Frysinger napsal(a):
5 > On Friday, September 17, 2010 15:41:17 Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
6 >> i found the painfull way that kernel eclass does not die if it fails to
7 >> unpack patch file supplied to it.
8 >>
9 >> So i propose the patch i attach for inclusion :)
10 >
11 > looks ok, thanks
12 As i run test to run src unpack for all ebuilds in sys-kernel only
13 tuxonice ones which were supposed to fail failed and got ack from Robin
14 too i commited the change. :)
15 >
16 >> patchfile gets ignored and you might fail to notice it (as it happened
17 >> to me since i use different workbox and commit box and upstream gladly
18 >> for fetching returns html code instead of good old 404).
19 >
20 > if it's a site listed in thirdpartymirrors, then it should be removed from the
21 > mirror list. if it's a site listed in SRC_URI, be nice to find a different
22 > site, but i guess that's not always feasible.
23 > -mike
24 Yeah i would love to, but this is some durpal site tuxonice upstream
25 migrated to :/
26
27 Tomas
28 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
29 Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
30 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
31
32 iEYEARECAAYFAkyT4ZoACgkQHB6c3gNBRYeSjACgsDMAJ6RYKjXxXU1ddkB24Yuw
33 s2IAoK7GfOoc/DhiTh1WK7JpWWbN4A2A
34 =Ot7k
35 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----