| 1 |
On Mar 31, 2012 11:00 AM, "Ciaran McCreesh" <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:55:27 -0400 |
| 5 |
> Richard Yao <ryao@×××××××××××××.edu> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > I think we should wait for Portage 2.2 to be stabilized before we |
| 7 |
> > declare Gentoo 2.0. @preserved-libs is enough of an advance that I |
| 8 |
> > think claiming 2.0 would be merited, if only for the attention it |
| 9 |
> > would draw at Phoronix. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Do you really want to be advertising an awful hack that doesn't really |
| 12 |
> work, is conceptually unsound and that breaks all kinds of things in |
| 13 |
> subtle ways? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> -- |
| 16 |
> Ciaran McCreesh |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
@preserved-libs works very well and is awesome. hack or not. IMO it should |
| 19 |
be in stable already. I've been using it on stable production boxes for |
| 20 |
years without any issues :) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Alex | wired |
Archives