Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
To: Daniel Goller <morfic@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 3.4 and ~x86
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 19:50:55
Message-Id: 1094932229.2092.43.camel@simple
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] GCC 3.4 and ~x86 by Daniel Goller
1 On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 14:43, Daniel Goller wrote:
2 > GCC 3.4 should be ready to go ~x86 w/o being profile masked in x86
3 > profiles anymore.
4 > There are no critical packages that dont compile with it.
5 > If anyone sees a reason to not unmask it, let me know, otherwise we
6 > would like to unamsk it soon.
8 Ideally I'd like to see us get all arches that can use gcc-3.4 on it and
9 in stable for the next release cycle. So this ~x86 unmask in profiles
10 has my blessing. Works best when used in tandem with >=binutils-2.15
11 (feature wise)
13 Users that experience failures of gcc/binutils/libc compiling itself
14 should send any bugs toolchain@g.o
15 Usually this is only limited the users with buggy athlon{,-xp} hardware
16 that ever seem to have problems.
18 Programs that fail to compile with 3.4.x that previously compiled with
19 3.3.4 should be routed to gcc-porting@g.o and package maintainers
20 respectively.
22 >
23 >
24 > --
25 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
26 --
27 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
28 Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded,toolchain) Developer


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 3.4 and ~x86 Daniel Goller <morfic@g.o>