| 1 |
On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 14:43, Daniel Goller wrote: |
| 2 |
> GCC 3.4 should be ready to go ~x86 w/o being profile masked in x86 |
| 3 |
> profiles anymore. |
| 4 |
> There are no critical packages that dont compile with it. |
| 5 |
> If anyone sees a reason to not unmask it, let me know, otherwise we |
| 6 |
> would like to unamsk it soon. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Ideally I'd like to see us get all arches that can use gcc-3.4 on it and |
| 9 |
in stable for the next release cycle. So this ~x86 unmask in profiles |
| 10 |
has my blessing. Works best when used in tandem with >=binutils-2.15 |
| 11 |
(feature wise) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Users that experience failures of gcc/binutils/libc compiling itself |
| 14 |
should send any bugs toolchain@g.o |
| 15 |
Usually this is only limited the users with buggy athlon{,-xp} hardware |
| 16 |
that ever seem to have problems. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Programs that fail to compile with 3.4.x that previously compiled with |
| 19 |
3.3.4 should be routed to gcc-porting@g.o and package maintainers |
| 20 |
respectively. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> -- |
| 25 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 28 |
Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded,toolchain) Developer |
Archives