| 1 |
Of course, by being restrictive to the people who wish to help long-term |
| 2 |
that is the greatest benefit to gentoo. If the @g.o email addresses are a |
| 3 |
problem then the subdomain @staff.g.o has been suggested. The staff |
| 4 |
subdomain would contain almost all relevant other domains. If in the |
| 5 |
unlikely event that somone proposes a subdomain to gentoo that couldn't be |
| 6 |
considered 'staff' or 'developer' then that can be considered at a later |
| 7 |
date. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
In the mean time we can have a GLEP about that site you were suggesting |
| 10 |
because that would make the ATs more efficient. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
On 11/19/05, Corey Shields <cshields@g.o> wrote: |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> On Friday 18 November 2005 07:40 pm, George Prowse wrote: |
| 15 |
> > Yeah, I think a sub-domain may not be a good solution but unfortunately |
| 16 |
> it |
| 17 |
> > is the best at present. The site is a good idea but nothing stops it |
| 18 |
> from |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> I disagree that it is the best idea.. Better on my list is to just not |
| 21 |
> hand |
| 22 |
> out email addresses if they can't be @g.o |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> What subdomain is going to come next? @xbox360ppcport.gentoo.org<http://xbox360ppcport.gentoo.org>? |
| 25 |
> I'll join |
| 26 |
> Kurt in the yellowstar domain.. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> -C |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> -- |
| 31 |
> Corey Shields |
| 32 |
> Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team |
| 33 |
> Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees |
| 34 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields |
| 35 |
> -- |
| 36 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> |
Archives