1 |
On 01/10/2017 01:56 PM, Bernard Cafarelli wrote: |
2 |
> Hi folks, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> gnustep-base/gnustep-make has a USE flag (libobjc2) masked globally in |
5 |
> base/package.use.mask, and unmasked on specific arches in |
6 |
> arch/{amd64,x86}/package.use.mask |
7 |
> |
8 |
> To get a stabilization (#579232) bug finally moving on, I wanted to |
9 |
> leave this flag out, adding a corresponding line in |
10 |
> base/package.use.stable.mask |
11 |
> |
12 |
> But repoman replied with a batch of dependency.bad errors... |
13 |
> Does package.use.mask (stable and ~arch) have a higher priority on |
14 |
> package.use.stable.mask (stable only)? Bug or intended behavior? |
15 |
> |
16 |
> In the meantime, I will probably work around this by duplicating the |
17 |
> package.use.stable.mask entry in arches files |
18 |
> |
19 |
|
20 |
If I understand you correctly, then it's the intended behavior. If the |
21 |
flag is masked in both package.use.mask and package.use.stable.mask, |
22 |
then the package.use.stable.mask setting is irrelevant because both |
23 |
package.use.mask and package.use.stable.mask are considered when |
24 |
calculating use.mask settings for any given package. |
25 |
-- |
26 |
Thanks, |
27 |
Zac |