1 |
On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 13:22 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
2 |
> > > > > > On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Michał Górny wrote: |
3 |
> > > Should we really warn about a package that (in its default |
4 |
> > > configuration) can only be installed if the user accepts non-free |
5 |
> > > licenses? |
6 |
> > That's one of the reasons it's only a warning and not a USE flag. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Still, "Gentoo will never depend upon a piece of software or metadata |
9 |
> unless it conforms to [a free license]" (Social Contract). |
10 |
> |
11 |
> If you really think that you must have that message, can you at least |
12 |
> downgrade it to einfo or elog? That would still be very visible, given |
13 |
> that it's in the pretend phase where there tends to be little output. |
14 |
> |
15 |
|
16 |
Can we please put users above silly politics? Gentoo 'does not depend' |
17 |
on any non-free package to print the warning. If people have hardware |
18 |
that requires non-free firmware, the least we can do is point out where |
19 |
to get this firmware from. |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Best regards, |
23 |
Michał Górny |