Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-p2p/transmission: transmission-2.12.ebuild
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 04:38:49
Message-Id: 4DBB9298.10507@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-p2p/transmission: transmission-2.12.ebuild by Jeremy Olexa
1 On 04/30/2011 07:10 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
2 > On 04/29/2011 01:34 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
3 >> On 04/29/2011 09:26 PM, Mark Loeser wrote:
4 >>> "Samuli Suominen (ssuominen)"<ssuominen@g.o> said:
5 >>>> ssuominen 11/04/29 18:13:31
6 >>>>
7 >>>> Removed: transmission-2.12.ebuild
8 >>>> Log:
9 >>>> drop old, broken with stable libnotify
10 >>>>
11 >>>> (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha30/cvs/Linux x86_64, RepoMan
12 >>>> options: --force)
13 >>>
14 >>> When removing an ebuild, please do document it in the ChangeLog.
15 >>>
16 >>> Thanks,
17 >>>
18 >>
19 >> no thanks
20 >>
21 >
22 > Not that I want to start a war over this little thing, but multiple
23 > times I've cursed under my breath trying to track down something *not*
24 > documented in the ChangeLog and I've asked you multiple times as well to
25 > start doing thing. So, it makes my life easier if you document removals
26 > in the ChangeLog too, please do.
27 > -Jeremy
28 >
29
30 sources.gentoo.org is for that. ChangeLog is for users, and "old" is
31 not useful information to them
32
33 So no, I won't start cluttering up ChangeLogs and I would prefer if
34 others would stop it as well

Replies