1 |
On Mon, 2005-19-12 at 21:08 +0100, George Shapovalov wrote: |
2 |
> Thanks, I'll try, but seeing gnome in the name I am quite skeptical. It's |
3 |
> really nothing personal. Its just in my experience gnome/gtk apps could never |
4 |
> handle cyrillic well enough in all situations.. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Yea, cyrillic is a bitch. Its probably worse than chineese, no really :). |
7 |
> These guys were later to the game, so even though they have like tons of |
8 |
> variants and intrinsically more complex stuff, at least they got it right. |
9 |
> With cyrillic we have like 4 different encodings for the very same thing, and |
10 |
> 3 of them are widely used (ironically, the one not used much is the "official |
11 |
> standard", well, as usual :)). So, you can imagine people having set their |
12 |
> environment to one encoding, client reporting another and, to top it off, |
13 |
> messages getting recoded while on the server (at least I can see a difference |
14 |
> when some poeple shift to direct mode after having logged in, versus messaged |
15 |
> left on server when somebody is out.. Well, that might be a server screwing |
16 |
> some reported settings, but that does not help.). As you can guess, I can't |
17 |
> wait for the last non-utf-8 aware app to die painfull death :) (whell, where |
18 |
> this kind of stuff is important of course). |
19 |
|
20 |
Modern ICQ is either unicode or specifies the encoding (but as a windows |
21 |
locale and not a regular encoding..). Old ICQ sucks and you have to |
22 |
guess.. If you have problems with GnomeICU.. please file a bug at |
23 |
bugzilla.gnome.org .. I'm the upstream maintainer too... |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Olivier CrĂȘte |
27 |
tester@g.o |
28 |
Gentoo Developer |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |