Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 21:47:04
Message-Id: assp.0399606d51.20170814174652.134ed8cd@o-sinc.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification by Gordon Pettey
1 On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 09:55:02 -0500
2 Gordon Pettey <petteyg359@×××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Alexander Berntsen
5 > <bernalex@g.o> wrote:
6 >
7 > > While the PMS perhaps hasn't been an unequivocal success, it's
8 > > still a good effort with some success. I would be disappointed to
9 > > see the proposed change, and view it as a bad sign for Gentoo.
10 > >
11 >
12 > Also, how many Portages are there that need to be managed with a
13 > "Portage Manager"?
14
15 If your asking about alternative package managers, I am aware of 2
16
17 paludis - requires heavy modification to environment
18 pkgcore - does not support EAPI 6, only experimental EAPI 5
19
20 pkgcore existed before PMS, and seems like more development before PMS
21 https://github.com/pkgcore/pkgcore/graphs/contributors
22
23 IMHO PMS was mostly about paludis and not Gentoo or portage. I recall
24 how it came about and the people behind the effort.
25 ~2007-02-09
26 http://marc.info/?l=gentoo-dev&w=2&r=86&s=pms&q=b
27
28
29 https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Paludis
30 https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Pkgcore
31
32 --
33 William L. Thomson Jr.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification Gordon Pettey <petteyg359@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification Marek Szuba <marecki@g.o>