Archives
Archives
| From: | Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting | ||
| Date: | Fri, 16 Sep 2005 22:48:46 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200509170045.51612.carlo@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting by Mike Frysinger |
||
| 1 | On Friday 16 September 2005 23:50, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 | > actually, going with say 'testing.mask' instead of '?arch' may be better |
| 3 | > ... reinforce the fact that this is a package-level issue rather than |
| 4 | > arch-specific |
| 5 | > -mike |
| 6 | |
| 7 | That's nearly as bad as having to deal with package.mask all the time. Keeping |
| 8 | the maintainer's opinion on an ebuild outside of it doesn't make any sense. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Carsten |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |