Re: [gentoo-dev] Making a common sub-profile for no-multilib

[Chris Reffett]

On June 25, 2014 2:44:57 PM EDT, "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
>Dnia 2014-06-25, o godz. 13:01:48
>Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> napisał(a):
>
>> At the moment there are two profiles in particular that do this,
>> amd64/no-multilib and hardened/linux/uclibc/amd64 ..  It's possible
>or
>> likely there are others, too, on other arches perhaps.
>>
>> In general, it's good that repoman notices this because those
>profiles
>> don't support having the 32bit deps installed.  However, if one of
>> those profiles ever moves from a dev profile to a stable one (and
>> blueness mentioned he would like to make uclibc/amd64 stable), then
>> those dependency.badindev warnings will suddenly turn into
>> dependency.bad errors.
>>
>> The solution to this would seem to be to package.mask all of these
>> 32-bit packages in the pure 64bit profiles.  However, having to do
>> this in multiple locations is annoying.
>>
>> I would like to propose adding 'no-multilib/[arch]/package.mask'
>> sub-profile(s), to allow all of these masks to go in one place.
>>
>> Populating package.mask should be fairly easy for amd64 at least,
>> since anything depending on an app-emulation/emul-* will need to be
>> masked.  However the merits of where the package.mask will go needs
>> discussion.  Perhaps, for instance, it's time to adjust the profile
>> tree hierarchy more aggressively instead of "piling on" with yet
>> another subdir.
>
>Forgive me for using such a words, but the profile tree is a well
>stacked pile of crap. We have a dozen random profiles for each arch
>then a dozen other profiles forked off them 'because the generic
>arch profiles have crap' and a lot of profiles that inherit others
>in a complex and semi-random manner.
>
>For example, abi_x86_64 and abi_x86_32 each need to be forced in 4
>profiles. This proves that we have 4 distinct profiles for amd64 which
>need to be kept in sync. If I change something, I need to perform
>the change in 4 different profiles and make sure I didn't screw
>something up.
>
>Then there's the x32 profile that inherits amd64 profile and therefore
>requires reverting some of the stuff done on amd64. To do a complete
>common change to x86-family multilib (like adding IUSE_IMPLICIT) I have
>to modify 9 profiles.
>
>Now let's add to this circa 8 mips profiles, around 3 ppc profiles, 4
>arm profiles and some more. Every arch organized in somewhat different
>and totally non-documented manner.
>
>Long story short, doing anything to Gentoo profiles is utter pain
>and comes with random breakage guarantee. Therefore, I'm asking -- nuke
>those damn profiles, and start over! The current situation is
>completely unmaintainable.

+1, I'm all for replacing it with something more usable. I personally would favor the mix-in approach, but just about anything would be better than the weird setup we have right now.

Chris