Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Nicholas D. Wolfwood" <blackace@g.o>
To: dolsen@g.o, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o>, gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o, agaffney@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Scire project - plans?
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 16:00:28
Message-Id: 20131029160019.6714DE0AE3@pigeon.gentoo.org
1 Sorry, I sent my last message before I read the rest of these, if anyone is interested in resurrecting it, that's awesome, feel free to hit me up with any questions about it and what we were doing.
2
3 Thanks!
4
5 Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> wrote:
6 >On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 17:15 +0400, Sergey Popov wrote:
7 >> Hello, i just want to raise question: should we add deprecation on
8 >> project page of Scire[1] or even remove this project entirely? Cause
9 >> project seems slightly abandonded, leader(agaffney) is in progress of
10 >> retiring[2], other project member(blackace) has no commit access to
11 >tree[3].
12 >>
13 >> CCing all interested parties
14 >>
15 >> [1] - http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/scire/
16 >> [2] - https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68900
17 >> [3] - https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45816
18 >>
19 >
20 >I'll join. Although I do have too many projects on my plate in some
21 >ways. I've always thought it would fairly easy to add another backend
22 >interface to porthole capable of interfacing with remote machines or
23 >groups of machines. It is something I'd like to add.
24 >
25 >It also goes with a plan to add an extension to eclean to get remote
26 >pkg
27 >lists from machines for consideration doing distfiles and binpkg
28 >cleaning.
29 >
30 >C'mon, there has to be more people interested in this...