Archives
Archives
| From: | Edward Catmur <ed@×××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split ELF Debug (default or not?) | ||
| Date: | Sun, 27 Nov 2005 15:27:19 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1133104957.15135.22.camel@capella.catmur.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split ELF Debug (default or not?) by Ned Ludd |
||
| 1 | On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 08:40 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 | > On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 15:09 +0200, Ivan Yosifov wrote: |
| 3 | > > And one more thing. For proper debugging, don't I need the source to be |
| 4 | > > present ? |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > -g3 -ggdb embeds the source code in the debug info so I don't see the |
| 7 | > point. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | It doesn't; at least not with gcc 3.4.4. It does embed function |
| 10 | prototypes and macro definitions, though. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Ed Catmur |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split ELF Debug (default or not?) | Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |