| 1 |
Out of curiosity, is anyone aware of a winex fix for glibc 2.3.2 yet? I |
| 2 |
would be wary stabilising glibc until it is (This doesn't count to the |
| 3 |
current accidental marking) as its quite the major package. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Apparently it works with nptl but the 2.5.72 sysctl.h is syntactically |
| 6 |
incorrect for gcc-3.3 (at least), easy fix mind. can anyone clarify? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I know this probably isnt the place to ask this, although it was kind of |
| 9 |
on-topic. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 01:44, Jay Goodman Tamboli wrote: |
| 12 |
> I just did a sync (server scrolled offscreen. logged |
| 13 |
> anywhere?), and I notice lots of upgrades, including glibc |
| 14 |
> to 2.3.2-r1 (from 2.3.1-r4). I started checking some of the |
| 15 |
> CVS logs, and at least for glibc, man, and fileutils, the |
| 16 |
> change of KEYWORD ~x86 to x86 was done by drobbins as part |
| 17 |
> of "amd64" fixes. I'd like to be careful about a glibc |
| 18 |
> upgrade, so can someone confirm that all these changes are |
| 19 |
> intentional and correct? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> /jgt |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
John Mylchreest. |
| 24 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Gentoo Linux: http://www.gentoo.org |
| 27 |
Public Key: gpg --recv-keys 0xEAB9E721 |
| 28 |
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEAB9E721 |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Key fingerprint:0670 E5E4 F461 806B 860A 2245 A40E 72EB EAB9 E721 |
Archives