| 1 |
On 12-09-2018 20:09:54 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 7:32 PM Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
| 3 |
> <chithanh@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Alon Bar-Lev schrieb: |
| 6 |
> > > We |
| 7 |
> > > are unique as permutations and architectures that are used by Gentoo |
| 8 |
> > > users are so diverse that we find issues that nobody else finds. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > This needs to be highlighted more, as it is why suggestions that the |
| 11 |
> > maintainer can simply put -Werror back on their own system are insufficient. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Wouldn't running into new runtime issues be exactly the sort of reason |
| 15 |
> why we'd want to build with -Werror on packages where these issues are |
| 16 |
> unacceptable? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Can you think of a way in which a new runtime issue would occur that |
| 19 |
-Werror would have guarded? And that issue would also get through |
| 20 |
maintainer and ~arch testing? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Fabian |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 26 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives