| 1 |
El vie, 27-04-2012 a las 21:12 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:58:24 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Of course, if we take the 'quick EAPI 5 route', it won't include |
| 5 |
> > anything useful. In the meantime, do we have a complete list of |
| 6 |
> > candidates for EAPI 5? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Let's continue this on the PMS list. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> * user patches |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> * EAPI parsing |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> * the things that were left out of 4: |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> + slot operator deps |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> + profile IUSE |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> * No -j1 for src_test |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> * Remove deprecated stuff |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> * Zero or one REQUIRED_USE operator |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> These might be cheap now? |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> * New bash version |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> * Get a versionator replacement into the PM |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Could: |
| 34 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408693 |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
be handled also? |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Thanks |
Archives