| 1 |
On Friday 09 June 2006 23:34, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 09 June 2006 16:35, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 3 |
> > This is the "official" (hehe) request for comments on making a policy of |
| 4 |
> > how to handle ebuilds than can be used for either client or server and |
| 5 |
> > how to allow for building client-only. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> rather than moving to some sort of policy that satisfies no one completely |
| 8 |
> and we'll have to back out of later, why dont we wait until portage can |
| 9 |
> give us proper support for USE=client/server |
| 10 |
> -mike |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
So we have two use flags - client and server. Here are the possabilities |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-client -server |
| 15 |
+client -server |
| 16 |
+client +server |
| 17 |
-client +server |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Do we read -client -server and +client +server to mean the same thing? |
| 20 |
If so the logic can read |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
if use client || ! use server ; then |
| 23 |
# build client |
| 24 |
fi |
| 25 |
if use server || ! use client ; then |
| 26 |
# build server |
| 27 |
fi |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
How does portage stop us from doing that now? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Roy Marples <uberlord@g.o> |
| 33 |
Gentoo/Linux Developer (baselayout, networking) |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives