From: | "Tony \\\"Chainsaw\\\" Vroon" <chainsaw@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] gen_usr_ldscript & --libdir=/lib | ||
Date: | Thu, 27 Dec 2012 07:53:32 | ||
Message-Id: | 1356594938.20663.21.camel@localhost | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] gen_usr_ldscript & --libdir=/lib by William Hubbs |
1 | On Wed, 2012-12-26 at 22:01 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: |
2 | > Actually, since ulm pointed out in another thread that the |
3 | > council has not mandated that we support separate /usr without an |
4 | > initramfs, I am re-considering this. |
5 | |
6 | So now that the /usr-merge steamroller can not break systems through |
7 | udev, because an alternative now exists... another way must be found? |
8 | That seems rather immature. |
9 | What must be forked next to keep this working? openrc? |
10 | |
11 | Regards, |
12 | Tony V. |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] gen_usr_ldscript & --libdir=/lib | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] gen_usr_ldscript & --libdir=/lib | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |