Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matthew Thode <prometheanfire@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] First (experimental) 17.1 profiles news item for review (v2)
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 19:32:51
Message-Id: 20171221193241.3g53btsj6kikalrx@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] First (experimental) 17.1 profiles news item for review (v2) by Mike Gilbert
1 On 17-12-21 09:10:09, Mike Gilbert wrote:
2 > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 2:44 AM, Matthew Thode
3 > <prometheanfire@g.o> wrote:
4 > > On 17-12-21 08:34:31, Michał Górny wrote:
5 > >> W dniu czw, 21.12.2017 o godzinie 05∶29 +0000, użytkownik Duncan
6 > >> napisał:
7 > >> > Michał Górny posted on Wed, 20 Dec 2017 14:40:27 +0100 as excerpted:
8 > >> >
9 > >> > In all this I don't see an answer to one question:
10 > >> >
11 > >> > Will this eventually be the only supported choice, or is the
12 > >> > compatibility-symlinked version going to be supported going forward too?
13 > >> > If it's to be only-supported, what's the timeline?
14 > >>
15 > >> The former. We'll make a timeline when the profiles are tested
16 > >> and stable.
17 > >>
18 > >
19 > > What group are the ones making this decision?
20 >
21 > The decision was effectively made by vapier in 2014 (see bug 506276);
22 > mgorny is the one doing most of the work in 2017. There's also a group
23 > of us who have been following the bug and experimenting with our own
24 > systems since then.
25 >
26 > If you disagree with this plan for some reason, please start a new thread.
27 >
28
29 Nope, just curious :D
30
31 --
32 Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature