| 1 |
On Wed, 2021-06-23 at 11:43 +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: |
| 2 |
> On mercoledì 23 giugno 2021 11:36:33 CEST Mart Raudsepp wrote: |
| 3 |
> > + jobs=$(( nproc + 1 )) |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I don't know who historically started the nproc+1 story (it looks to be in the |
| 6 |
> handbook too), but it has been demonstrated that nproc+1 is slower than nproc. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Demonstrated on what? This largely depends on the task in question. |
| 10 |
In this case, I guess nproc makes more sense and makes things simpler |
| 11 |
as it's got little I/O overhead. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Best regards, |
| 15 |
Michał Górny |
Archives