1 |
Yuri Vasilevski wrote: |
2 |
> Hi, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:02:00 -0500 |
5 |
> Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> |
8 |
>>On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 23:20 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>>>The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or |
11 |
>>>removed from the tree, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23h59 UTC. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>>OK. Here's a fun question for you... |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>>Is it possible to have a slightly modified version of this script run, |
16 |
>>and the output sent to gwn-feedback for inclusion in the GWN? This |
17 |
>>would make my life tremendously easier, since currently I have to |
18 |
>>completely reformat this by hand. |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>>Basically, I would want the output to look like: |
21 |
|
22 |
Yeah I can modify the output to do tables. If I can find the script, I |
23 |
know it's on one of these lab machines ;) |
24 |
|
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
> I think it should also include the Homepage(s) and Description of the |
28 |
> packages so readers could easily check what that additions are all |
29 |
> about. While I'm not that sure that additions date and probably who |
30 |
> made the addition are that important for readers. |
31 |
|
32 |
The only reason the contact and date are there is because the code for |
33 |
removals and additions is basically the same (A or D tells me which one |
34 |
it is) and all that info is available in the CVS history file. The |
35 |
problem with HOMEPAGE or DESCRIPTION is that they are version specific |
36 |
and there is no way to choose which version to pick in the case where |
37 |
more than one version was added at the same time. |
38 |
-- |
39 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |