| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 06:46:21 -0400
|
| 5 |
"Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> wrote:
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> Why can't we keep both? There are strong advantages/disadvantages |
| 8 |
> either way and there are users invested in both new/oldnet. I know |
| 9 |
> this is more work on doc writers, but I don't think that will equal |
| 10 |
> the pain users will experience being forced one way or another. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I guess quite a good solution for now might be enabling newnet through
|
| 13 |
an USE flag, being masked in the profile by default. That would satisfy
|
| 14 |
the oldnet compatibility requirement for users, while the small group
|
| 15 |
preferring newnet could still benefit from it.
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
- --
|
| 18 |
Best regards,
|
| 19 |
Michał Górny
|
| 20 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| 21 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkyXQCIACgkQnGSe5QXeB7tR2gCfeix45C4N1MFvHf864ReeavLn
|
| 24 |
xz8AoOUiUpwYb+Dan1LpmwhCHKdTO/nN
|
| 25 |
=fcQc
|
| 26 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives