1 |
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 02:16:30PM -0800, Patrick McLean wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:37:48 -0600 |
3 |
> William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 09:04:47PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
6 |
> > > >>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, William Hubbs wrote: |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > Well, the OpenRC project is currently inconsistent about this, so the |
9 |
> > intention is to make it consistent. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > The .c/.h files have file-scope licenses, but that isn't true for |
12 |
> > everything in the project. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > I am willing to make the effort to do this, I was just wondering if |
15 |
> > there are any legal pitfalls I need to worry about. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > My theory is I can probably use git to find out who all of the authors |
18 |
> > are, and generate an Authors list from that information and from |
19 |
> > looking at copyright notices. |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> |
22 |
> One concern about this is the possibility of copied code. If OpenRC |
23 |
> ever copied code from other BSD licensed projects, then dropping the |
24 |
> notice from the top of the file would be a violation of the upstream |
25 |
> license. |
26 |
|
27 |
The only thing I know about immediately that we have copied from an |
28 |
upstream is queue.h, and sure, I wasn't planning on touching that file. |
29 |
The same applies to any other files copied from an upstream that I find, |
30 |
or any functions that I see that are obviously copied. I'm thinking I |
31 |
will be able to detect this by extra copyright notices that are from |
32 |
sources not listed in the log. |
33 |
|
34 |
William |