| 1 |
Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
| 2 |
> I proxy maintain bitcoins for luke-jr. He wants to propose a patch |
| 3 |
> against the bitcoin eclass. The following is his proposed change. |
| 4 |
> I'll commit it after review. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Please do not do that, Anthony. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> Bitcoin Knots includes a number of enhancements users may find useful. I |
| 10 |
> think it would be a good idea to make it the default for Bitcoin |
| 11 |
> ebuilds (net-p2p/bitcoin-qt, net-p2p/bitcoind, and dev-util/bitcoin-tx). |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I can only interpret this patch one way: sshole takeover attempt |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I disagree very strongly. >:( Matt's suggested approach (separate |
| 16 |
bitcoin-knots ebuild) seems like the right thing to do. I assume |
| 17 |
there is no binary incompatiblity between the two packages? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Luke-Jr: I hope you're not maintaining a patchset, but a separate |
| 21 |
project. A patchset would be utterly silly, since it causes |
| 22 |
completely unneccessary user confusion. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
//Peter |
Archives