Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: George Prowse <cokehabit@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-dev vs lkml?
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:42:56
Message-Id: 45F97676.1070208@gmail.com
1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:44:37 +0000 George Prowse <cokehabit@×××××.com>
3 > wrote:
4 >
5 >> Joe was leaving anyway. Ask Joe to leave soon which saves every
6 >> single problem. Joe just does what he was going to do, you get what
7 >> you want and the company keeps on running smoothly. The company then
8 >> has the choice of making it known to you that it will not be
9 >> tolerated in the future.
10 >>
11 >
12 > You miss the point. This was not the first time a resignation stunt had
13 > been pulled by that developer, and previously another developer had
14 > been strongly warned about resigning for publicity.
15 >
16 >
17 Then deal with the situation in ways i have already said in about 5
18 other emails to the list
19 --
20 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-dev vs lkml? Seemant Kulleen <seemant@g.o>