| 1 |
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 11:40:00AM -0800, Sean P. Kane wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Portafge, because if it breaks, it can leave a system in a very |
| 4 |
> difficult to recover state. We should all display enough maturity to not |
| 5 |
> label email headers "SERIOUSLY fucked up ?", avoid labeling people, and |
| 6 |
> simply work at fixing the problems and moving on. Those of us who need |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Since I wrote the original subject, I feel addressed. What does maturity |
| 9 |
have to do with a program that (was) fucked up? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
- It was broken? Yes. |
| 12 |
- It broke earlier versions? Yes. |
| 13 |
- It broke the system too? Yes. |
| 14 |
- Did the recovery involve infrequent procedures? Yes. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I'd say it being seriously fucked up was a good description, right? [0] |
| 17 |
Anyway, I'm only interested in people not getting bitten by it. I shall |
| 18 |
not reply anything else about this. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
[0] Now, the other possibility is that you dont like to read that word. In |
| 21 |
that case I suggest you to sed your emails and dont ever look at |
| 22 |
dictionaries. Or pluck your eyes out ;) |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Ragnar Hojland - Project Manager |
| 25 |
Linalco "Especialistas Linux y en Software Libre" |
| 26 |
http://www.linalco.com Tel: +34-91-5970074 Fax: +34-91-5970083 |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives